Welcome
OSC Regulators!
Your Department will be receiving fresh complaints from
Campbell’s Activist Shareholders (CRSA) in the near
future. The news that the OSC has a new
Departmental Head is very welcome news to Campbell’s
shareholders.
'Bulldog' gets enforcement post
JANET MCFARLAND
Saturday, January 24, 2009
http://www.globeinvestor.com/servlet/story/GAM.20090124.ROSC24/GIStory/
You have just ruled in the HudBay / Lundin takeover plan, and small
shareholders across Canada and the western world are
cheering!
If you have no plans to help us, we have our backup plans. We
are laying the ground work for a massive class action lawsuit in New
York District Court. (We have no immediate plans to file
– a lot depends on what happens next.)
A more desirable outcome is for Campbell to start acting like a GOLD
and copper mining company that is producing real profits with realistic
operating levels. And many of us will quietly go away if that
happens. So there is a way out here for everyone.
Andre Fortier needs to play a little more golf and enjoy his peaceful
and happy retirement.
In the event of a takeover of merger, we also know that all 13 Canadian
province Securities Commissions will need to approve the
deal. We (the Activist Shareholders) will have our members
camping out in front of these other Commissions (for example, the New
Brunswick and Alberta offices).
Activist shareholders have been in contact with Campbell’s
Institutional shareholders, and we think several of them will back
us. It was one prominent Institution (Jaguar Financial) that
made the difference in the HudBay / Lundin case.
And in honest defense of the Executives that we name, please
note that the suggestions on this website that Campbell and Nuinsco
Executives acted inappropriately or unethically are unproven
allegations – they are just shareholder opinion.
But this opinion is backed by actual commonly documents. We ,
so we are not
acting out of malice. In most cases we directly quote the CEO
and pull excerpts from company filings.
Here are some alleged improprieties to get your Enforcement squad
started on:
1) We
have now found a press release that documents that there was a
Feasibility study performed on the Copper Rand mine in 1997.
The study proved RESERVES of almost 300,000 ounces of GOLD, and proved
that the Reserves could be profitably mined over a 5 year
period. The production cost was demonstrated to be
so low that it would provide a 17% investment return even at the gold
and copper prices seen in 1997.
The Copper Rand Feasibility study (the first one, not the second one)
has been “locked up” by Management, and Management
refuses to share the study results with current shareholders in a
public (press release) manner. We have made written requests,
and Management has refused.
This is a massive impropriety because a large group of shareholder was
granted access to this information in the late
90’s. See links on the homepage of this website.
2) The
proven fact that the Copper Rand mine can be operated
profitably, even with much lower gold and copper prices.
Campbell accomplished this in late 2005 (for 2 full
quarters). As soon as Sprott and Nuinsco arrived on the
scene, the “downplay games” started.
What we have seen since 2006 is that the Nuinsco Operations Consulting
team may “somehow accidentally” targeted only the
lowest grade (most unprofitable) areas of the Copper Rand mine for
production , in order to create losses for the
company. Quarterly results were never in line with
operating plan, and the excuses would “sicken the
stomach” of an educated observer.
3) The
clear signs that Reserves and Resources numbers have been
manipulated (data omitted) at both Copper Rand and Joe Mann.
Geologist reports have been called into question. See links
on the homepage of this website.
4) We dispute and challenge Nuinsco's claim that they own 50% of the Corner Bay mine (or
50% of the cash flow). We have presented legal options and
precedent that Nuinsco’s claim that they own 50% of Corner
Bay is invalid, and that Campbell still owns 100% of the Corner Bay
mine and all cash flow (forever).
Alert: We probably have a case against the Auditors (Samson Bélair / Deloitte & Touche)
5) Improper Market Making activity?
In the last few weeks before Campbell stopped trading under the symbol
CCH.TO (December 2008), we saw unusually large blocks of shares offered
at the ASK price of $0.005 and 0.01. The size of the ASK at
both of these prices was around 9 million shares.
Activist shareholders believe that this was improper and
illegal. We have a strong suspicion that no holder of CCH
share was actually interested in selling 18 million shares at that
price, and that the ASK blocks where
“phantom”. We think the goal
was to scare away small buyers, and to try to induce tax
selling. Do those guys who were trying to sell 18 million
shares change their mind?
As backing for these suspicions, please note that now in January,
buyers of CBLRF share are having trouble getting their buy orders
filled. Right now (late January 2009) we are seeing blocks of
CBLRF shares on the Ask, and then when small investors try to buy those
shares (at the ASK price) they have difficulty getting their buy orders
filled). Canadian Market makers (with seats on the New York
OTC) may be behind these games.
We hope you will investigate this alleged market maker
impropriety. We think it is illegal to put shares out on the
ASK, if there is no intention of actually selling those shares (or the
shares don’t even exist).