Parallels with the HudBay / Lundin case

Read recent news in Canadian paper and websites about HudBay / Lundin ruling. This news coverage specifically mentions the opinions that Management Insiders made moves against the interests of shareholders.  

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=hudbay+lundin+merger+base+metal+properties+&btnG=Search

The HudBay / Lundin case has eerie (clear) parallels with what we see with Campbell.  There is clear precedent here – Corporate Boards actually do act this way sometimes (as much as our resident Shills like Meggy deny it).

Hey Meggymoo (from the Investor Village public message board), how come you never answered our posts where we asked for you to comment on the reports that most of Campbell’s Board members have resigned recently?

Nuinsco and Victory Nickel own a large number of low grade base metal properties.  Recent drill results from Nuinsco’s properties have been under-whelming and not spectacular (a bit of a disappointment).  One recent drill result report for a Nuinsco property had copper grades about 1/10 the grades at Corner Bay (UN-economic grades at today’s metal prices).

How convenient it would be for Nuinsco to merge with Campbell, and then suck out the profits from Campbell’s high grade (profitable) mines, to help finance the other two cash-poor companies.  

The press coverage of HudBay / Lundin also suggest that companies with Base metal properties are using tricks and deception to get their hands on the “the good stuff” (properties with high profit gold mining operations).